Search for: "Gill v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg suggests that “[c]ataloging some of the instances where courts incorporate math helps illuminate how the Court should proceed in Gill v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” At The Hill, Jacqueline Thomsen reports that “[a] top sociology group fired back at Supreme Court Justice John Roberts for referring to sociology as “’gobbledygook’” during the oral argument last week in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Christopher Elmendorf and Eric McGhee respond to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s complaint at last week’s oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” At RealClear Politics, Matt Walter weighs in on Gill v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
On Tuesday, the justices heard oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
The first is Gill v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
At Yahoo News, Roger Parloff reports that the court’s decision whether to “wade into the inherently political quagmire of district mapping” in Gill v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
” Additional coverage comes from USA Today, the New York Times and The Hill. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr notes that the Supreme Court’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “extraordinary developments in Wisconsin,” where partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
” At ElectionLaw@Moritz, Edward Foley discusses Gill v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that a three-judge panel on Thursday chose not to enter a preliminary injunction declaring Maryland’s sixth congressional district an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander; the court put further proceedings on hold pending the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Dimaya (October 2) Gill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court agreed to hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
’” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the court may decide as early as today not only whether to grant review in Gill v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the court could announce today whether it will review a lower court decision holding that Wisconsin’s “redistricting plan violated the Constitution’s First Amendment and equal rights protections because of partisan gerrymandering”; he explains that the case, Gill v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
Ryan v. [read post]
