Search for: "Give Something Back, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 1,702
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This is a known sort of deindexing scam, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
I hope Columbia one day might invite me back to celebrate your career, Professor Fox. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 10:48 am by Chris Castle
But something happens to these publishers when they get to Washington, DC and they go rogue or they are encouraged to go rogue. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 5:39 pm by Russell Knight
The witness is supposed to suddenly have the memory of what is written come back to them and then testify right after. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:06 am by centerforartlaw
Motivated by the exploration and power of chance, the collage process is the grounding medium of my practice, giving me continuous stimulation from unexpected sources. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
To that, I emphasize the advice that I give to would-be investors: do not rely on the marketing materials and read the prospectus instead. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007). (2500 words). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
After nearly two weeks, the plaintiff was transferred back to Avery-Mitchell. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
 In this post, I’ll examine the final two “off-ramp” arguments that Donald Trump offers the Court—arguments that would have the Court reverse the judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court without adjudicating whether the Constitution precludes Trump from serving as President. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
In this post, I’ll examine the final two “off-ramp” arguments that Donald Trump offers the Court—arguments that would have the Court reverse the judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court without adjudicating whether the Constitution precludes Trump from serving as President. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Whereas [Biogen Canada Inc v Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc, 2020 FC 621] suggests that something more than a mere unity of invention objection from the patent examiner is required in order for the divisional application to constitute a forced divisional application. [245] The preferred approach is an informed middle ground. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:26 am by Gregory Weber
Who knows, maybe in reading this post, you can find something that gives you your own federal contracting new year’s resolution. [read post]