Search for: "Givens v. Maine Department of Corrections" Results 21 - 40 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2010, 12:37 am by Eugene Lee
This is particularly true given that strict filing deadlines apply (180 days to file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and 1 year to file a charge with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing). [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Given the general emphasis on comity in this field, it is perhaps surprising that the CJEU’s approach was given such short shrift, particularly as both Lord Toulson and Lady Hale explicitly expressed their unease with the substantive results of their decisions. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm by Zachary Spilman
This credit will be given by the authorities at the correctional facility where the accused is sent to serve his confinement and will be given on a day-for-day basis. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:33 am by Stuart Brooks, Olswang LLP
The images show certain parts of the design (including its wheels and strap) in darker shades than the main body. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am by Maria Roche
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment  Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
An example is given of a situation in which it might be not clear which of the reasons given by the Examining Division in its communications might be essential to the decision to refuse, and it is stated that in that situation a fully reasoned decision should be issued instead (see C-V, 15.3 "Issuing a self-contained decision").2.2 In the present case, the applicant submi [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Frank Cranmer’s case note on the decision superbly summarises the facts, the various grounds argued and the main findings of the detailed judgment. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by John Mikhail
  The abstract of the paper is given below, followed by several tables and figures that summarize the paper’s main findings. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:22 am by CMS
Further, the Court of Appeal had been right to depart from Thirlwall LJ’s finding that Travelers had nothing to do with the uninsured claims. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:34 am by Susan Brenner
And [his] main purpose . . . was to observe the vehicle [Pollard] was occup[ying]. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
This morning Lord Neuberger handed down the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in the Trunki case, PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]