Search for: "Givens v. McDonald"
Results 21 - 40
of 673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 12:56 pm
The Supreme Court’s awaited case in McDonald v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:24 pm
Those who expect the Supreme Court to rethink and perhaps overturn the Slaughterhouse cases in McDonald v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:53 am
The post Liebeck v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:53 am
The post Liebeck v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:48 pm
Thanks to Mike Sacks (featured in the video) for the link: Mike has more video and more pictures of the McDonald line over at FIRST ONE @ ONE FIRST Copyright © 2010 This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:05 am
Additional Resources: McDonald’s Settles with Franchise Workers for $3.75 Million in Wage Theft Lawsuit, Nov. 3, 2016, By Laura Clawson, Daily Kos More Blog Entries: Hill v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm
This question seems particularly compelling given the egregiousness of the underlying allegations here. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:46 am
If they could establish an “ostensible agency” relationship—which would require showing, among other things, a reasonable belief McDonalds was their employer—McDonalds could be held jointly liable for the franchisee’s alleged violations of California wage laws (Salazar v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
Accordingly, the Court accurately explained in Presser v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
Phoenix of Broward v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:27 am
Instead, because ostensible agency “may be implied from circumstances,” the issue of whether the franchisee’s employees “reasonably believed” the franchisee was acting as McDonald’s agent, thus providing a basis to impose liability on McDonald’s, appropriately could be decided on a classwide basis (Ochoa v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:20 pm
Sutton v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:24 am
So, after all the hype, life after the McDonald v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:55 am
Given that McDonald's took no steps to accommodate the complainant, and indeed did not even meet with her until the decision to terminate her employment had been made, the Tribunal awarded $25,000 for loss of dignity and self-respect.See: Beena Datt v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:32 am
” A state appeals court, in a 2018 decision in Curry v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 7:47 am
Miller v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:26 am
Bruce may have given McDonald the login information for that account on one occasion for the limited purpose of printing tickets for a joint activity with their child. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:52 pm
As Jim Lindgren has noted, on the eve of the argument in McDonald v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:38 am
See blog post from Newnan Pratlaw explaining the Stella Liebeck v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:37 am
As Matthew Scarola at SCOTUSBlog put it, "Today’s opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
