Search for: "Givens v. Spencer"
Results 21 - 40
of 288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
Spencer v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:27 am
(Our thanks to Spencer Turner for this guest post) Brent Council v Shah and Others, unreported 29 January 2018 (Crown Ct (Harrow)) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) has been successfully used by Brent Council against landlords for breach of licencing conditions. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
In Russell Road Food & Beverage, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
Given my interest, I thought I would flag a new decision by District Judge Charles Breyer, United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:53 am
The First Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Batt Cables Plc v Spencer Business Parks Ltd [2010] ScotCS CSOH_81 (01 July 2010) A new case on BAILII from the outer House of the Court of Session (approximately equivalent to the High Court). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Batt Cables Plc v Spencer Business Parks Ltd [2010] ScotCS CSOH_81 (01 July 2010) A new case on BAILII from the outer House of the Court of Session (approximately equivalent to the High Court). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:20 pm
Spencer, No. 12-2194. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm
Paticularly given the history described above. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In Gomez v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:17 pm
Spencer, No. 06-2591. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:03 am
This post was drafted by Paul Jacobson and Andrew Brought, attorneys in the Kansas City, Missouri, office of Spencer Fane LLP. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
That was the issue addressed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its decision this month in Spencer-Forrest v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:03 pm
Mark v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:09 am
The Colorado Supreme Court recently handed down its decision in Miller v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
But the Supreme Court recently, in Munaf v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 6:02 am
Reporting on the July 31st COA decision in Joshua Cunningham v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:54 am
Likewise in the High Court, the Claimant wished to rely on them in the High Court in relation to their case on distinctiveness (and not as evidence of confusion).It is clear from Interflora 1 (Interflora v Marks and Spencer [2012] EWCA Civ 1501) and Interflora 2 (Interflora v Marks and Spencer [2013] EWCA Civ 319) that surveys should only be permitted if they are of "real value". [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm
More on Atkins v. [read post]
