Search for: "Good v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 21 - 40
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2020, 1:46 am
Non-Negs may typically only be used to place bets at the gaming tables for their face value and cannot be used to buy goods or services, nor encashed. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 1:06 am
On 26 and 27 January 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in the matter of Balhousie Holdings Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:00 pm
Giamelli v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 9:52 am
Commissioner. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:04 am
"A convicted felon may be granted a Certificate of Relief from Disabilities, which signifies rehabilitation, by a court or the Board of Parole [Section 701, Correction Law] or a Certificate of Good Conduct from the Board of Parole [Section 703-a, Correction Law]. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 8:57 pm
Circuit’s decision in FTC v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:29 am
That is its most common meaning and it makes good sense in the context of the statute. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:33 am
Following enquiries, the Commissioners seized most of the detained goods and returned the remainder. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 8:42 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm
Kerik was the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections at the time of the renovations and the company that provided the services was looking for a city contract. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:15 am
”Tier III hearings address the most serious inmate misbehavior implicating the most severe punishment and "may be conducted by the superintendent of the correctional facility, the deputy superintendent, a captain, a commissioner's hearing officer employed by DOCS's central office," or "some other employee" designated by the correctional facility's superintendent "in his or her discretion. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 12, which was handed down on 22 March 2023. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:49 pm
Moreover, [Francis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
"Tier III hearings address the most serious inmate misbehavior implicating the most severe punishment and "may be conducted by the superintendent of the correctional facility, the deputy superintendent, a captain, a commissioner's hearing officer employed by DOCS's central office," or "some other employee" designated by the correctional facility's superintendent "in his or her discretion. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:48 am
The Court of Appeal agreed with the FTT and ruled that the scheme was not abusive and so the Supreme Court had to decide if the Court of Appeal was correct to reinstate the FTT ruling. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:53 am
., and Mellion v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:55 pm
Dep't of Transp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:01 am
Greenberg v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:14 am
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (“”HMRC“) found that News Corp was not entitled to supply these digital editions at zero-rate VAT. [read post]
