Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 8,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Naranjo v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Naranjo v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Naranjo v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Naranjo v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Naranjo v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
California (2021), which held that the flight of a suspected misdemeanant does not always justify a warrantless entry into a home: "Even as the newly formed states filled the pages of their penal codes with new felonies each passing year, '[t]he felony category' at the Founding still remained 'a good deal narrower [then] than now.'" Similarly, an officer cannot shoot a fleeing felon, the Court said in Tennessee v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:41 am
This won’t undo the years of harm done by ICE but it is a good first step towards justice. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:02 pm
For example, in Italian Colors Rest. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:00 am
Just last week, in Bustamante et al. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
— If the Northern District of California’s recent rulings with Bright Data were a bit of a surprise, its recent decision in the X Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:18 pm
On May 6, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:15 pm
In Naranjo v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
(Or at least the best one that doesn't take up 20,000+ words.)The California Supreme Court has to wade into all this in deciding this opinion, which holds that, in this particular context, the required mental state of "knowing" is belied by a good faith belief in the legality of one's conduct. [read post]
