Search for: "Graham v. State Department of Correction" Results 21 - 40 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2008, 11:03 am
§ § 7-13-107(e) and 7-13-411(e) suggest that the Department of Corrections is responsible for such expenses. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 The FCEICA seeks to correct this result.The latest version of the FCEJICA preserves the so-called "Nazi exception," which states in partNazi-era claims. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm by Wolfgang Demino
It additionally departs from the most on-pointcase that can be cited for the proposition that other states’ judicial decisions on matters of evidence should be disregarded in favor of home-grown decisional law. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm by Jeremy Gordon
Srinivasan challenges Phillips’ third contention, suggesting that United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-736 Issues: (1) Whether the Multistate Tax Compact has the status of a contract that binds its signatory states; and (2) whether a state law that imposes retroactive tax liability for a period of almost seven yea [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 7:40 am
Madison County Department of Child Services (NFP) Louis Polus, et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 2:47 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Graham On February 22, 2018, the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento, issued a judgment granting petition for writ of mandate and declaratory and injunctive relief (Judgment) to suspend further chemical activities undertaken by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to control or eradicate pests under the Statewide Plant Pest Prevention and Management Program (the Project) until CDFA has certified a Program Environmental… [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
  In Messerschmidt v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit improperly departed from the Supreme Court’s decision in White v. [read post]