Search for: "Grant A Gomez" Results 21 - 40 of 347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 6:25 am
Grant and Lanie Gomez bought their home in Scottsdale, Ariz. in 2006 and refinanced in 2007, both with Wells Fargo. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:44 pm
Gomez, No. 119 Defendant’s drug conviction is reversed where the state did not sustain its initial burden of establishing that its search of Defendant’s vehicle constituted a valid inventory search, and thus Defendant’s motion to suppress should have been granted. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
 He did it in the decision’s final paragraph which is reproduced in full as follows: Accordingly, plaintiff Reina Carrillos’ motion for summary judgment is granted only to the extent that the court issues a declaratory judgment that plaintiff is the owner of 40% of the stock of Arlington Bodden Corp. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 1:26 pm by Kendall Lowery
“The RPPG team brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to the grant seeking and application process that has elevated the quality and output in our grant writing,” said Mary Alvarez-Gomez, the City of San Bernardino’s Grants Division Manager. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:42 am by John G. Papianou
The Supreme Court granted certiorari because at least three Courts of Appeals had held that an unaccepted offer can moot a plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:42 am by John G. Papianou
The Supreme Court granted certiorari because at least three Courts of Appeals had held that an unaccepted offer can moot a plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 12:11 pm by Steven Boutwell
By Chelsea Gomez Caswell On Thursday, March 26, 2015 a U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:48 am by Sean Wajert
After limited discovery, the District Court then granted Campbell’s motion for summary judgment on the merits, relying on the Navy’s sovereign immunity from suit under the TCPA. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:11 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Gomez v Fuenmayor 2016 WL 454037(11th Cir, 2016) the Eleventh Circuit held that sufficiently serious threats and violence directed against a parent can nonetheless pose a grave risk of harm to a child as well. [read post]