Search for: "Grant Thomas Garrett" Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2015, 7:46 am by Amy Howe
California Teachers Association and discusses how Justice Clarence Thomas might vote: “On the one hand, his political conservatism would lead one to expect him to invalidate fair share fees, but perhaps his originalism will cause him to rule against the petitioners. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Sarah Grant summarized the Maryland U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the grant for this blog; contributors to our “snap symposium” on the grant included Nicholas Bagley, Abbe Gluck, and Jonathan H. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:21 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, Brandon Garrett, in a guest post at ACSblog, discusses the relationship between federal habeas corpus law and efforts to gain access to DNA evidence. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:30 am by Savanna Nolan
As UB Law Professor Garrett Epps explains in The Atlantic, “[u]nder Supreme Court rules, it takes four justices to grant review of a case, but five to grant a stay of a lower-court ruling. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:03 am by Laura Orr
Leading book club discussions is the always insightful Susie Marcus and with her Shelley Larkins, the winning, inquisitive and fun attorney coach from Grant HS’s Con Team. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:03 am by Laura Orr
Leading book club discussions is the always insightful Susie Marcus and with her Shelley Larkins, the winning, inquisitive and fun attorney coach from Grant HS’s Con Team. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
” In his column for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at Justice Clarence Thomas, who will soon begin his twenty-fifth year on the Court, and suggests that Thomas has “always marched to the beat of his own conservative drum, and lately the rhythms of that drum have become more distinct. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
These four justices create a block of four votes required to grant review of lower courts' decisions.Justice Thomas, in particular, has consistently dissented from the Court's prior refusals to take up Second Amendment cases. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses last week’s summary opinion in Tolan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Alfred Brophy
The full list of presenters includes: Darren Bush (University of Houston Law Center); Thomas P. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:30 am
The Logic of Real Arguments (Cambridge University Press, 1988), in particular, chapter 3, “A first example—from Thomas Malthus,” pp. 29-47.Murdoch, William. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 10:22 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Anna Salvatore shared Justice Clarence Thomas’s statement on the Supreme Court’s decision not to review the scope of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Garrett Hinck  posted the European Commission’s report on the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:57 pm
She agreed, and the court granted a motion to substitute them in as counsel. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:12 am
Michael Jakes of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner in Washington, and arguing for David J. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
” In The Washington Examiner, Paul Bedard reports that Ginni Thomas – the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas – has dismissed rumors that Thomas will retire as “bogus. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman weighs in on the decision here, and Will Baude looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’ separate opinion, in which Thomas expressed “skepticism … about the doctrine of qualified immunity,” here. [read post]