Search for: "Grant v. Parker"
Results 21 - 40
of 731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am
Warby Parker * Court Dismisses Trademark Claims Over Internal Search Results–Las Vegas Skydiving v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am
(See Phillips-Smith Special Retail Group IL L.P. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, L.L.P, 265 AD2d 208,210 [1st Dept 1999].) [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award totaling $20,944,200 for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Parker v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am
V. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:00 pm
(Bet there wasn't any advance notice of that, either.)# # #DECISIONParker v City of Yonkers [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
The M/V Miss Cissy (“Miss Cissy”), a 46.5-foot commercial vessel owned by Parker Drilling Offshore USA, LLC (“PDO”), was sailing on the waterway at the same time ahead of them. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
The justices granted review in two cases presenting this question, Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
Medicare Exclusion Risks: Employing Excluded Individuals Can Result in Significant Administrative, Civil and / or Criminal Liabilities (May 8, 2023): One of the most severe administrative sanctions available under the Social Security Act stems from the authority of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)[1] to “exclude” individuals and entities from participating in Federal health care programs.[2] While the… [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
In my last post, I outlined some things I hoped to learn from Justice John Paul Stevens' papers about Kelo v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Parker and Robinson) answers that question in the affirmative, as the Board is empowered to determine the conditions of release, and that power coexists with the Board's quasi-judicial power to grant, deny, or revoke parole. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
” — Parker Rider-Longmaid, one of Rodney Reed’s attorneys — April 19, 2023 The Court’s opinion in Reed v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
” — Parker Rider-Longmaid, one of Rodney Reed’s attorneys — April 19, 2023 The Court’s opinion in Reed v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Over 40-years old, CEQA requires lead agencies to prepare environmental documents prior to granting discretionary approvals. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #Parker v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am
In Coy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]
