Search for: "Grant v. Royal" Results 21 - 40 of 1,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
The latest book from journalist and royal reporter, Omid Scobie was embroiled in controversy this week, when the Dutch translation of the publication named two members of the royal family who were alleged in 2021 to have speculated about the skin colour of Prince Harry’s unborn son. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
 Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. 108, 119 (2013) (citing Morrison, 561 U.S., at 265). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCT Act) received Royal Assent on 26 October 2023, bringing with it wide-ranging reforms to tackle economic crime. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
The defendant’s counterclaim was successful and she was granted an injunction to prevent the defamatory remarks being republished, in addition to general and aggravated damages. 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP summarised the decision. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
On 26 October 2023, the Online Safety Act received royal assent. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am by Frank Cranmer
It will now go to the House of Commons for final consideration ahead of Royal Assent. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The granting of the injunction would also mean that the claimant would retain 100 per cent of the existing business, notwithstanding the 58 per cent shareholding of the majority shareholders. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
: on Mrs K Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
On the tenancy deposit, held the deposit of £800 was received in February 2015 (and again in May and August on further tenancies being granted) but not protected until November 2015, after yet a further grant of tenancy. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:57 am by Matrix Law
The High Court (Judge Russen QC) granted summary judgment in favour of the Bank: [2021] EWHC 10 (Comm). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
The Canons of 1603/4 had no statement about what Holy Matrimony was, just details about preliminaries, and place and time of marriage (42); who can grant licences to marry, and other details about licences (101, 102 & 103); and various provisions about divorce (105,106 & 107). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
In this post, Isabel Emerson, Senior Associate, and Anna Walsh, Partner, in the Clinical Risk and Medical Advisory and Professional Discipline and Regulatory team at CMS preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Paul and another v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (2) Polmear and Anor v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust and (3) Purchase v Ahmed These three conjoined appeals were heard by the Supreme Court on 16 – 18 May 2023. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]