Search for: "Grant v. Target Corporation" Results 21 - 40 of 1,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
From its controversial collaborations to its legal skirmishes with corporate giants, MSCHF’s journey exemplifies the complexities and contradictions inherent in the intersection of art and copyright law. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:36 am by Jeffrey T. Dinwoodie
  See, e.g., Memorandum of Law in Support of Coinbase’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, SEC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
Or it could uphold one (probably Texas's), or grant a partial or staged loss in the manners discussed in the previous FAQ. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Unknown
As disclosed in Apple’s 2023 Proxy Statements, when a Monte Carlo analysis was used to calculate the grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs, the NEOs were awarded $92,685,830 in performance-based shares for 2021, and $94,021,780 for 2022. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am by Guest Author
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
… The CourtAppeal Watch: the legality of multi-Crown class proceedings in Sandoz Canada Inc. v British Columbia Last November, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) granted leave to Sanis Health Inc., Shoppers Drug Mart Inc., Sandoz Canada Inc. and McKesson Canada Corporation to appeal Sandoz Canada Inc. v British Columbia, 2023 BCCA 306 (“Sandoz Canada”). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:59 am by Unknown
" In addition to his significant stock ownership, Musk was a "Superstar CEO," holding influential corporate positions such as CEO and founder. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Plaintiffs instead are targeting companies that allegedly have failed to anticipate supply chain disruptions, persistent inflation, rising interest rates and other macroeconomic headwinds. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:06 am by Unknown
SEC staff have previously denied no-action requests seeking to exclude similar proposals (Exxon Mobil Corporation v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
McCormick of the Court of Chancery addressed an issue of first impression in Crispo v. [read post]