Search for: "Grantham v. Grantham"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:53 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: K579.L5 L39 2015Kit Barker, Ross Grantham & Warren Swain, eds., The Law of Misstatements: 50 Years on from Hedley Byrne v Heller (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 2:18 pm
Hart Publishing is delighted to announce the publication of ‘Law of Misstatements: 50 Years on from Hedley Byrne v Heller’ edited by Kit Barker, Ross Grantham, Warren Swain 2013 was the 50th anniversary of the House of Lords’ landmark decision... [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:33 am
The style of the case is, Spurlock v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
It is styled, Spurlock v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
*****PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
The Inn Sign for the Beehive public house in Grantham Photo Wikipedia The Lincolnshire town of Grantham educated one of the world's greatest scientists and the first woman ti be British prime minister (see "Frit" - Merck Sharp Dohme Corp v Teva Pharma BV 25 March 2012). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
Earlier today this Kat posted this note on Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), the latest in a line of important trade mark rulings from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
The case is Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), yet another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, for England and Wales. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 3:08 am
SEC and Amgen v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Margaret Thatcher's birth place in Grantham Source Wikipedia According to Wikiquote, "frit" is an unusual Lincolnshire dialect abbreviation of 'frightened' which Mrs Thatcher evidently recalled from her Grantham childhood. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:16 am
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Magwood v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:01 am
Mohr v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:05 pm
Section 509(a) The case is Grantham v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
It looks to me as if the life tenant, Robert Crawley, Earl of Grantham, could have barred the entail, but in fact he decided not to, because he did not want the estate to be broken up. [read post]
