Search for: "Graves v. Commonwealth"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
Facebook has agreed to pay a settlement of $52m in a court case alleging the company failed to protect workers tasked with moderating disturbing content from the grave mental health impacts of the job. [read post]
8 May 2020, 7:05 am
Shak v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:39 am
Nonetheless, in Burwell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
As evidence of this trend, consider the Court’s decision in American Legion v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
In addition to amounts otherwise made available, $100,000,000, to remain available through September 30, 2021, shall be available for the Secretary of Agriculture to provide grants to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and American Samoa for nutrition assistance in response to a COVID–19 public health emergency: Provided, That such amount is designated by the Congress as being for an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the … [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
The epitaph on Texas Ranger Captain Bill McDonald’s grave says “No man in the wrong can stand up against a fellow that’s in the right and keeps on a-comin’. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 7:10 am
The July 24, 2019 opinion in Stone v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
The Guarantor hereby consents to the jurisdiction of the state and federal courts of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
The Guarantor hereby consents to the jurisdiction of the state and federal courts of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:20 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
The one earlier judicial reference I could find was in a dissent to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's 1943 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
”The court found none of the above circumstances present, explaining, “[Plaintiff] has not advanced any facts to show that the forum selection clause specifically was obtained by fraud or overreaching…[and Plaintiff] offered no evidence that it will be gravely inconvenient or that it would be unfair to litigate this case in the forum state to which it agreed. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:06 am
This law, which has been applied in various other states, was addressed in a landmark case in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts entitled Diaz v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm
When the possibility of the husband subsequently making a tactical decision not to read and rely upon the affidavit evidence of his mother at the trial, so as to prevent her from being available to be cross-examined by counsel for the wife, was raised, counsel for the husband’s mother pointed out that the husband would then face grave, probably insurmountable difficulties in his defence of the wife’s application… [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]