Search for: "Graves v. Powers" Results 21 - 40 of 1,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
The consequences for democracy, public health, and social harmony are emergent and grave. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
A late complication has arisen unfortunately concerning a Tudor painted roof/ceiling, which, although it will not affect the grant of the faculty may impact on the precise timing of the commencement of works which is dealt with in the Conditions”, The petition sought permission: (i) to install lavatories in the north transept in an area near to the organ, (ii) to enclose the chapel space in the eastern bay of the north transept to create a sound-proof room which can be heated… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
A review of the case in in our post Evidence from the Grave III ] Churchyards and burials Designation of closed churchyard Churchyard Regulations Reservation of grave space Designation of closed churchyard See Privy Council Business. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
It found the laws amounted to grave and systemic violations of human rights. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am by centerforartlaw
Under the Copyright Act of 1976, fair use is an affirmative defense to federal copyright protection.[17] Fair use protects a creator’s ability to build upon prior art and is a check on the power that copyright affords to its rights holders. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Laura Kalman is undoubtedly correct to note in her contribution that Taft was a wretched president, but she understates the extent to which he was an innovative and powerful advocate for reforming essential presidential powers, like the system of executive budgeting which we today take for granted. [read post]
” Taken together, these statements represent a powerful warning of the likely and extremely grave and irreversible violations of international law, and of the Court’s orders, if the ongoing military action in Rafah (including air strikes) is continued and/or expanded at this time and under these circumstances. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Klara Nedrelow
”[2] On January 26, 2024, the Court issued an Order indicating six provisional measures against Israel, including requiring it to “take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II of this Convention. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
Not unrelatedly, the Court seemed to go out of its way to express its grave concern about the fate of the October 7 hostages and to call for their immediate and unconditional release. [read post]