Search for: "Graves v. Powers"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
The consequences for democracy, public health, and social harmony are emergent and grave. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
A late complication has arisen unfortunately concerning a Tudor painted roof/ceiling, which, although it will not affect the grant of the faculty may impact on the precise timing of the commencement of works which is dealt with in the Conditions”, The petition sought permission: (i) to install lavatories in the north transept in an area near to the organ, (ii) to enclose the chapel space in the eastern bay of the north transept to create a sound-proof room which can be heated… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Corner Post v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
For instance, the 1993 California case Johnson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
[The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
A review of the case in in our post Evidence from the Grave III ] Churchyards and burials Designation of closed churchyard Churchyard Regulations Reservation of grave space Designation of closed churchyard See Privy Council Business. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
In Kejriwal v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
It found the laws amounted to grave and systemic violations of human rights. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Under the Copyright Act of 1976, fair use is an affirmative defense to federal copyright protection.[17] Fair use protects a creator’s ability to build upon prior art and is a check on the power that copyright affords to its rights holders. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
The SEMA thus grants the executive branch broad powers. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Laura Kalman is undoubtedly correct to note in her contribution that Taft was a wretched president, but she understates the extent to which he was an innovative and powerful advocate for reforming essential presidential powers, like the system of executive budgeting which we today take for granted. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court, however, held in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
” Taken together, these statements represent a powerful warning of the likely and extremely grave and irreversible violations of international law, and of the Court’s orders, if the ongoing military action in Rafah (including air strikes) is continued and/or expanded at this time and under these circumstances. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
”[2] On January 26, 2024, the Court issued an Order indicating six provisional measures against Israel, including requiring it to “take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II of this Convention. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
Not unrelatedly, the Court seemed to go out of its way to express its grave concern about the fate of the October 7 hostages and to call for their immediate and unconditional release. [read post]
