Search for: "Gray v. Kagan"
Results 21 - 40
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
Previously, the Supreme Court opinion which was most influential in ‘gray market’ dealings was Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:14 am
This post was written by Sarah Wolff, Amy Greer and Neil Gray. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:07 pm
In the case of Ransom v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:16 pm
In 2010 the Supreme Court looked at this issue in Costco V. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm
This led to a 1998 case, Gray v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
Finally, in Gray v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
Gray plays a key role in screening judicial nominees. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
Bellaizac-Hurtado, 700 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2012) • Elena Kagan, American Express Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:58 am
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan also seemed sympathetic, indicating that the case was similar to the court’s 1998 decision in Gray v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:54 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Gray v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
ShareIf the justices’ comments during Wednesday’s argument in New York v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
The Associated Press previews Ortiz v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am
The gray lines show the trends over time. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
How far into the gray zone should the rule extend? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The case then went back to the district court for a determination of damages – but in the meantime, the Court decided the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:30 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
Also known as the gray market, these unofficial sales are a $63 billion industry. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
Also known as the gray market, these unofficial sales are a $63 billion industry. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:43 am
Supreme Court has announced that it will hear Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
