Search for: "Green v. CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT"
Results 21 - 40
of 366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 1:58 pm
Department of Homeland Security, ____ F. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:34 pm
Fuqua, No, 05-0303 (Tex. 2009)(Green)THOMAS GRABER AND HOPKINS & SUTTER v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:23 am
California Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm
California Department of Corrections (Cal. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
Next Steps for Stakeholders Keep on the lookout for updates from the Departments and more information from Epstein Becker Green. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:14 am
The court concluded that, in situations where a debtor filed the correct documents to reopen her bankruptcy and correct the error, as the debtor in Quin v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 6:44 am
Arizona Department of Corrections. 2013 U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:17 am
The Green court then explained that New York Penal Law § 205.00(3) grants the State Department of Correctional Services [DOCS] the authority to declare what is contraband. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
” [96] The Judge then expressed his concern over whether setting the bar so high is correct or justifiable any longer. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 11:01 am
Director/Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2016 U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:33 am
Gauthier v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Green (1980)—are aberrations and products of a no-longer popular legal school of thought. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Green (1980)—are aberrations and products of a no-longer popular legal school of thought. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:17 am
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in Scalia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 11:20 am
This is doubtless correct. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
The decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
__Reed v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
Tawnya Bearcomesout (Double Jeopardy)Green v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 9:17 am
June Medical Services v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
In Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services of New York v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 73 NY2d 26, the Court of Appeals held "whether a document qualifies as a personnel record under Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) depends upon its nature and its use in evaluating an officer's performance — not its physical location or its particular custodian. [read post]
