Search for: "Green v. Federal Bureau of Prison" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by royblack
Christina Pietz, a forensic psychologist for the Bureau of Prisons, opined that Loughner has a severe mental illness, “he is one of the worst,” but is nonetheless competent. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 8:56 am by paperstreet
Christina Pietz, a forensic psychologist for the Bureau of Prisons, opined that Loughner has a severe mental illness, “he is one of the worst,” but is nonetheless competent. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:48 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Today in America nearly 20 percent of all federal prisoners (over 35,000) are confined in prisons managed by private corporations under contract with the Federal Bureau of Prisons. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:39 pm by Elizabeth A. Wilson
Madigan, held that a federal prisoner bringing a Bivens action for violation of his Eighth Amendment rights is not required to exhaust administrative remedies available through the Bureau of Prisons grievance procedure. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:20 pm by zshapiro
Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics the Supreme Court announced that citizens had the right to sue individual government agents in Federal Court for violations of their Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:17 am by John Elwood
§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Mills faces up to five years in prison and a $50,000 fine per day of violation when he is sentenced on September 22, 2010. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Mills faces up to five years in prison and a $50,000 fine per day of violation when he is sentenced on September 22, 2010. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency, according to a joint status report filed yesterday in federal court. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm by Anna Christensen
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1971) had not been decided when Section 233(a) was enacted. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:54 am by Anna Christensen
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1971), establishing that – even in the absence of legislation authorizing a suit – a victim of a constitutional violation can bring an action for damages directly under the Constitution. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Click Here Prosecutor on Mancuso brothers: ‘They sunk themselves:’ Paul, Steven face prison time after jury finds them guilty in asbestos case. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to Mills… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]