Search for: "Green v. Martin" Results 21 - 40 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
 SCOTUSblog reports that the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Packingham v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:02 am
Just last week (Sept 12),  for example, a federal judge in Vermont ruled in Green Mountain Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Philadelphia lawyer Wally Zimolong on his blog, Supplemental Conditions Brown v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 8:56 am by library
Martin, 532 U.S. 661 (2001) and he also stands on a Betamax video player to represent his opinion in Sony Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:37 am
That you committed an act that resulted in the death of another person – In the People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:58 am by Eric Goldman
This isn’t a new legal conclusion; other cases include the 2003 Green v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Caroline Ncube
- Bernard Maister, Caspar van Woensel• Sport as a brand and its legal protection in South Africa - Owen Dean• Notes and updates• Comment on the Green Paper for post-school education and training - Shihaam Shaikh• Confusion and the bounds of trade mark monopolies: Foschini v Coetzee - Jeremy Speres• The panados and panadon’ts of trade mark registrations: recent developments regarding trademarks used in the pharmaceutical industry - Marius Roetz•… [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 11:54 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Special Issue: Global Policy Review David Kleimann, Niclas Poitiers, André Sapir, Simone Tagliapietra, Nicolas Véron, Reinhilde Veugelers, & Jeromin Zettelmeyer, Green tech race? [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 2:48 pm by Howard Friedman
 The court remanded for further findings an Establishment Clause challenge to the rule.In Martin v. [read post]