Search for: "Griffin, in Re" Results 21 - 40 of 799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 7:48 am by Yosi Yahoudai
”A grid search is just an opportunity to go inch by inch over an area, especially a very large area, making sure that we’re able to comb through a lot of the different elements that we have out here,” Hill told reporters as she spoke from the site of the search. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:48 am by Yosi Yahoudai
”A grid search is just an opportunity to go inch by inch over an area, especially a very large area, making sure that we’re able to comb through a lot of the different elements that we have out here,” Hill told reporters as she spoke from the site of the search. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am by Josh Blackman
" The Caesar Griffin Case, Staunton Spectator (12/15/1868) at 2. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 3:39 am by SHG
It’s cool to say “you have a right to speak,” but if you’re precluded from speaking, whether because of cancellation, disruption or pressure of being shunned, it’s an empty right. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  First, it’s likely that many or all of the Justices will want to preserve states’ authority to prevent rebels and insurrectionists from holding state offices, as New Mexico did in the Couy Griffin case currently pending before the Court. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
  The “Griffin’s Case” argument that Section 3 can only be enforced pursuant to a congressionally enacted statute (or, presumably, in a manner the Constitution itself authorizes, e.g., impeachment, or a House of Congress prohibiting an insurrectionist from sitting). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
“You might think they’re frivolous, but the people who are bringing them may not think they’re frivolous. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
You're suggesting there may be a barrier under the Constitution to a state legislating an enforcement mechanism for Section 3 specific to federal officers. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
Trump relies on a very old circuit court case, In re Griffin (1869), in which Chief Justice Samuel Chase ruled that Section 3 was inoperative until Congress passed enabling legislation. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
“The state courts should have regarded congressional enforcement legislation as the exclusive means for enforcing Section 3, as Chief Justice Chase held in In re Griffin,” a circuit decision from 1869. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
Now that the Colorado Secretary of State has filed her brief, all the parties’ (and amici’s) briefs have been submitted except for the reply briefs of Petitioner Trump and Respondent Colorado Republican State Central Committee, which are due on Monday, three days before the oral argument next Thursday. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:30 am by Jack Bogdanski
 If the caretaker secretary of state, LaVonne Griffin-Valade, wanted to do us all a service, she could come up with a better system. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Mike LaChance
“Until Harvard makes it very clear that they’re going to resume their role as [educators of] young American men and women to be leaders, to be problem solvers, to take on difficult issues, I am not interested in supporting the institution” The post Billionaire Ken Griffin Stops Donating to Harvard Due to Its DEI Agenda first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm by Josh Blackman
The post We're In The Section 3 Endgame Now appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]