Search for: "Griffin, in Re"
Results 21 - 40
of 802
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Were Trump re-elected, and contrary to Professor Lederman's hopes and aspirations, the question of whether the President is an "Officer of the United States" will not be "re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
” Perhaps, then, those arguments will be re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship from whence they came. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:46 am
App. to Pet. for Cert. 53a (quoting Griffin's Case, 11 F. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
”A grid search is just an opportunity to go inch by inch over an area, especially a very large area, making sure that we’re able to comb through a lot of the different elements that we have out here,” Hill told reporters as she spoke from the site of the search. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
”A grid search is just an opportunity to go inch by inch over an area, especially a very large area, making sure that we’re able to comb through a lot of the different elements that we have out here,” Hill told reporters as she spoke from the site of the search. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
" The Caesar Griffin Case, Staunton Spectator (12/15/1868) at 2. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 3:39 am
It’s cool to say “you have a right to speak,” but if you’re precluded from speaking, whether because of cancellation, disruption or pressure of being shunned, it’s an empty right. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
First, it’s likely that many or all of the Justices will want to preserve states’ authority to prevent rebels and insurrectionists from holding state offices, as New Mexico did in the Couy Griffin case currently pending before the Court. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:01 am
“We’re just moving spots, hitting different walls,” he said. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
The “Griffin’s Case” argument that Section 3 can only be enforced pursuant to a congressionally enacted statute (or, presumably, in a manner the Constitution itself authorizes, e.g., impeachment, or a House of Congress prohibiting an insurrectionist from sitting). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
“You might think they’re frivolous, but the people who are bringing them may not think they’re frivolous. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
You're suggesting there may be a barrier under the Constitution to a state legislating an enforcement mechanism for Section 3 specific to federal officers. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Griffin's Case and Original Meaning The strongest defender of Griffin's Case was Justice Kavanaugh. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Mitchell insisted, "No, we're not giving it up at all. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
A 19th Century Supreme Court case, In Re. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post, I’ll discuss the first of the CRSCC’s off-ramp arguments, which invokes Chief Justice Chase’s opinion in In re Griffin, 11 F. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Trump relies on a very old circuit court case, In re Griffin (1869), in which Chief Justice Samuel Chase ruled that Section 3 was inoperative until Congress passed enabling legislation. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
“The state courts should have regarded congressional enforcement legislation as the exclusive means for enforcing Section 3, as Chief Justice Chase held in In re Griffin,” a circuit decision from 1869. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
Now that the Colorado Secretary of State has filed her brief, all the parties’ (and amici’s) briefs have been submitted except for the reply briefs of Petitioner Trump and Respondent Colorado Republican State Central Committee, which are due on Monday, three days before the oral argument next Thursday. [read post]
