Search for: "Griggs v. Griggs"
Results 21 - 40
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
As aficionados of Griggs v Ross Evans [convenient link here for non-aficionados], might expect, Fresh Trading’s defence was that whatever the legal ownership of the copyright, the principles of equity dictated that they owned a beneficial interest in the mark, either as owner or as a licensee. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Griggs v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:11 pm
The conclusion in Griggs Group Ltd v Evans was that there had been no implied term regarding title to copyright, and only a limited licence.Judge Hacon summed up the principles to be applied at paragraphs 22 and 23 of his judgment. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:13 pm
Griggs, 61 M.J. 402, 410 (C.A.A.F. 2005).Judge Crawford's separate opinion stated, in part, "Rather than relying on United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
Berman, Marsha Griggs, and Carol Chomsky. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
In Griggs v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 am
SEL relied on the High Court judgment in Griggs v Evans and argued that such an assignment should be implied, relying on the reasoning of Mr Prescott QC in that case:“Because the designer is not an employee of the company the legal title to the copyright belongs to him, because the Copyright Act says so; but the equitable title belongs to the company. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
At the heart of the Ricci case was the doctrine of disparate-impact discrimination, which the Supreme Court first articulated in its 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am
In it he discusses Robert Belton's The Crusade for Equality in the Workplace: The Griggs v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:34 am
” Alice L. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
” Alice L. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:37 am
In an (unpublished) Order last week in Griggs v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 5:49 am
Disparate impact liability--as adopted in Griggs v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 2:41 pm
In Griggs v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
These requirements on the insured constitute a condition precedent to coverage under the policy according to our 5th Circuit in the 1999 opinion styled, Griggs v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:21 am
Griggs and a case decided a month ago, State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:04 am
The case is Espinoza v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:46 am
” Griggs v. [read post]
