Search for: "Grissom v. Grissom"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2012, 9:18 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:58 am
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:03 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:09 am
"Lawyers for Mentally Ill Inmate Seek Stay of Execution," is by Brandi Grissom's post at the Texas Tribune. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:44 am
"Hearing Denied for Inmate Set for Execution Aug. 1," is Brandi Grissom's Texas Tribune report. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
"Lawyers Argue Inmate Incompetent for Aug. 1 Execution," is Brandi Grissom's post at Texas Tribune, today. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:21 pm
Grissom v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:56 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:50 am
Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:14 am
Of course, I do think there are things that can be done legislatively to retard if not eliminate prosecutorial misconduct, but in the wake of Connick v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:07 am
Lawyers across the country, including those for at least two Texas death row inmates, were eagerly awaiting the court’s ruling in the Martinez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court decided Martinez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:21 am
Tuesday's Supreme Court ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:03 am
More on Martinez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
For some states, that could require major spending on court-appointed lawyers for thousands of convicts.The federal case mentioned is Martinez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm
Grissom v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:28 am
That's the title of a Texas Tribune post written by Brandi Grissom and Ryan Murphy. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
Brandi Grissom wrote, "Murder Cases Put 'Junk Science' in the Spotlight," for the December 26 Texas edition of the New York Times. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
She decries prosecutors use of tactical maneuverings to avoid so-called "Brady" disclosures (after the US Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. [read post]
