Search for: "Grosvenor v. Grosvenor"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the… [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:17 am
The LVT noted that it had no power to extend time once the 21 days had passed (note, it was wrong about that, see Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Adams [2008] RVR 173).The appellant then sought permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:17 am
The LVT noted that it had no power to extend time once the 21 days had passed (note, it was wrong about that, see Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Adams [2008] RVR 173). [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:17 am
The LVT noted that it had no power to extend time once the 21 days had passed (note, it was wrong about that, see Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Adams [2008] RVR 173).The appellant then sought permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:12 am
Talk America Qwest Gets Mixed Rulings on Contract Arbitration Issue—Grosvenor v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
In Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 (discussed by us here), the original purpose of the design or adaptation was also stressed. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
In Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 (discussed by us here), the original purpose of the design or adaptation was also stressed. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:32 pm
What puzzles me slightly, particularly given the stated aim of consistency, is the difference in approach to that of Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 (which I briefly discussed here). [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:01 am
Sony Network Entertainment Qwest Gets Mixed Rulings on Contract Arbitration Issue—Grosvenor v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 1:41 pm
I should not, I suppose, get too excited about what is little more than a marketing puff (Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1892] EWCA Civ 1) - an attention-grabbing but legally dubious proposition. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 7:31 am
Dow Jones * Qwest Gets Mixed Rulings on Contract Arbitration Issue—Grosvenor v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Sony Network Entertainment Qwest Gets Mixed Rulings on Contract Arbitration Issue—Grosvenor v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:02 am
Talk AmericaQwest Gets Mixed Rulings on Contract Arbitration Issue—Grosvenor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
Sony Network Entertainment Qwest Gets Mixed Rulings on Contract Arbitration Issue—Grosvenor v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
Talk America Qwest Gets Mixed Rulings on Contract Arbitration Issue—Grosvenor v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
Sony Network Entertainment Qwest Gets Mixed Rulings on Contract Arbitration Issue—Grosvenor v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
Sellers v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
Eaton Mansions (Westminster) Ltd v Stinger Compania De Inversion SA [2011] EWCA Civ 607 We're a bit late with this one, sorry. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
Eaton Mansions (Westminster) Ltd v Stinger Compania De Inversion SA [2011] EWCA Civ 607 We're a bit late with this one, sorry. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties and Another [2008] UKHL 5 on when is a house a house within the meaning of section 2 (1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967? [read post]
