Search for: "Gutierrez v. People of the State of California"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2014, 1:22 pm
Gutierrez and People v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:43 am
Gutierrez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
[link; video] Rahm Emanuel and Luis Gutierrez: La pareja dispareja? [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am
Gutierrez, and Holder v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
Gutierrez, Mark A. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:09 am
[2] The case is Gutierrez v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:00 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Catlin,(Cal. 2001); People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:22 am
Gutierrez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:52 pm
Judge Walker has ordered that the stay of entry of judgment in Perry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:09 am
On June 29, 2010, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, decided People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
(People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Gutierrez-Avascal, No. 07-40779 Sentence including restitution for conspiring to possess marijuana with intent to distribute is affirmed where the statute authorizing discretionary restitution orders for defendants convicted of certain crimes also applied to conspiracy to commit any of the enumerated crimes. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 12:24 am
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
5 May 2008, 8:58 am
By Cori BadgleyOn April 16, 2008, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued an opinion in Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations v. [read post]
