Search for: "HALE v. HALL" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 8:51 am
  As the district judge in Peoples was completing her order granting remand, her neighbor down the hall was busy denying remand on similar facts in Hale v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
As we all know, Harlow DC v Hall later meant that on the then wording of Form N28, the tenancy ended on the date of possession in the order regardless of breach of terms. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
As we all know, Harlow DC v Hall later meant that on the then wording of Form N28, the tenancy ended on the date of possession in the order regardless of breach of terms. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am by Laura Sandwell
Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor, heard 9 – 10 October 2013. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Nicola Waghorn, Olswang LLP
Law It was held at both first instance and the Court of Appeal that the correct test for vicarious liability is a two-stage test following the case of Lister v Hesley Hall Limited [2002] 1 AC 215. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
 14 and a half years later, Mr Kernott asks for half of the Badger Hall property. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into the courts of another State without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm by Mark Walsh
Hall, a 1979 Supreme Court ruling that said a state could be haled into another state’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 5 December 2019 there will be a hearing in the case of Triplark v Northwood Hall & Ors. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into another State’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The Supreme Court is considering the issue in Manchester CC v Pinnock, in which it heard oral argument earlier this year but in which written submissions on the effect of the decision in Kay v UK have been invited, and three other cases, Hounslow LBC v Powell, Leeds CC v Hall and Frisby v Birmingham CC, have been listed in the Supreme Court in late November raising the same or overlapping issue. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am by Laura Coogan
  He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]