Search for: "HALL v. SULLIVAN"
Results 21 - 40
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
The Second Circuit (Hall, Sullivan and Bianco), writes:We are thus left to survey a landscape of conflicting Appellate Division decisions. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:43 am
Some cases do not.The case is Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:07 am
In this case, the Court of Appeals (Hall, Sullivan and Bianco) finds that the evidence supports the finding that defendant gave the police false evidence resulting in plaintiff's arrest and prosecution. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Where an infant was captured on video when his mother was the subject of the surveillance, a psychiatric injury was alleged, and a settlement of €50,000 was approved by O’Sullivan J in the Circuit Court (O’Brien Lynam blogpost). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
Sullivan for the law of defamation. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:09 pm
When Anthony Motta Jr. was in seventh grade, he was sitting in study hall doing work when another student came up from behind him and started choking him until he almost “blacked out,” Motta testified at a 2017 trial in Sullivan County Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:56 am
The parties raise a cornucopia of issues.While the trial court threw out the jury verdict in plaintiffs' favor on their individual commissions and granted Aqualife judgment as a matter of law on that claim, the Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Carney and Hall) brings that claim back. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:22 am
But she does not, the Court of Appeals (Raggi, Sullivan and Hall) says, for the following reasons:First, in order to have a good retaliation claim, your internal discrimination complaint must be made in good faith. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
The Sullivan Cases Abernathy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Sullivan, 372, 327 U.S. 58, 70 (1963) and Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
” The bill follows the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
The case hung over the activists (and the New York Times) for years until the Supreme Court finally dismissed Sullivan’s claims in the landmark 1964 free speech case New York Times v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980)). [read post]
