Search for: "HAMMERS v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
” The court similarly excuses the misreporting of the plaintiff’s state of incorporation, saying Jones replicated information from a trademark filing rather than doing his own independent investigation. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:28 pm
The First Circuit’s decision in Klauber v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
That lawsuit, Boudreaux v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Wakefern v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm
S. 162 (2011); United States v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Precedents like Train v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:33 am
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father John Hammer 52. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
