Search for: "HARPER v. LORD" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 4, 2021, we discussed the First Amendment arguments in the House of Representatives' Managers' trial memorandum. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:18 am by Jennifer
King (Annex KF 228 .K36 K56 2006) Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
The courts have stressed that, to give proper protection for responsible journalism, the defence must be applied in a practical and workable manner: Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 PC; Harper v Seaga [2009] 1 AC 1 PC. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
”  Eighteen months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog)   US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog)   US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Barrister Amal Clooney and former President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger have co-edited a textbook titled Freedom of Speech in International law. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Abramovich v Harper Collins, issued on 22 March 2021 Last Week in the Courts On 21 and 22 March 2021 Nicklin J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
 I agree with Lord Hoffmann that the new defence is “available to anyone who publishes material of public interest in any medium”: Jameel, at para. 54. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
Surveillance The Investigatory Powers (Amendment) Bill had its second reading in the House of Commons this week, after being introduced in the Lords last November. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:26 am by Giesela Ruehl
Supreme Court abandoned the Chevron Oil test in Harper in 1987. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The House of Lords Select Committee on Communications have published a report entitled “Growing up with the internet” [pdf] recommending an ambitious programme of digital literacy, minimum standards for those providing internet services and commitment to child-centred design. [read post]