Search for: "HCA-Information Technology " Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia:  In the case of Google Inc v ACCC ([2013] HCA 1) the High Court of Australia held that Google was not liable for engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct as a result of the production of sponsored links. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:32 am by Eric
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, [2013] HCA 1, S175/2012 (High Court of Australia Feb. 6, 2013). [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm by war
The film companies also sent iiNet on a weekly basis AFACT notices which purported to set out information about subscriber’s accounts that were being used to communicate infringing copies. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:28 am by Eric
In considering whether conduct is misleading and deceptive, the conduct as a whole is to be considered 'in light of the relevant surrounding facts and circumstances' (Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  Its investigation shows “that phone hacking and illegal information theft were not done on behalf of one “rogue” reporter or one newspaper. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:59 am by war
Lardken claimed that “Ausra’s” patent applications had been developed from confidential information about Lardken’s technology which, it was alleged, Ausra accessed at Lloyd’s facility. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September 2006)), Canada (Champagne v Collège… [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  The article discusses the landmark decision of the the High Court of Australia’s in Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick ([2002] HCA 56) The article argues that, whilst internet technologies have brought about a revolution in communications, their legal impact in the context of internet defamation has been more modest but nevertheless important. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:35 am
Rich Elmore at Healthcare Technology News reports on the Tiger Team on security and privacy recommendations regarding the handling of personally identifiable health information. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:39 am by Lawdable
Panelists are from companies such as AT&T Mobility, AutoZone, Cox Communications, FedEx, Fidelity Investments, HCA, International Paper, Partners Healthcare, and SunTrust Banks, among others. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:39 am by Lawdable
Panelists are from companies such as AT&T Mobility, AutoZone, Cox Communications, FedEx, Fidelity Investments, HCA, International Paper, Partners Healthcare, and SunTrust Banks, among others. [read post]
29 May 2009, 7:53 am
If you would like more information on the event or to inquire about attending in 2010, please email us. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:26 am
Our approach also evolves with the evolving law in this area and the development of available technology. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:32 am
An HCA spokesman has reportedly said that the company continues to deny the allegations and would defend them vigorously in court. [read post]