Search for: "HIGH v. THE STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 35,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 10:47 am
In the case of Dausab v The Minister of Justice, applicant Friedel Dausab, a Namibian gay man working as an LGBTQ rights activist, stated that he endured hardship by openly living as a gay man. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:42 am
” The ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Dicta in an early case, Hylton v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
Bruno Aiub (Monark) and State Prosecution Office (São Paulo, MPSP) v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm
Nevertheless, in January 2022, the Court held Mr Lynch and his CFO guilty of fraudulently inflating Autonomy’s value by misleading JP about its performance: Autonomy and others v Michael Richard Lynch and another (17 May 2022) High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts England and Wales. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
Dicta in an early case, Hylton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
’” In Labrador v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
Code, § 720(a); see also Daubert v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:29 am
Notably, 67% of Americans opposed the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:53 pm
Romania will become 18th member state in September. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 10:07 am
The high court again considered the issue in 2004 in ACLU v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
In SCL v. v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2017 CanLII 69241 (ON LAT), the Applicant was seriously injured when s/he was struck by a golf cart. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:50 am
This is not the only high-profile climate lawsuit that Crabtree has been involved in as a judge. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
United States (2023) Fischer v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
See Maia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
High Sch. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
High Sch. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:03 am
United States: In order to get work, the defendant used as a front a company that qualified as a “disadvantaged business enterprise,” though the company performed no actual work. [read post]