Search for: "HOLDER v. WYETH" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Wyeth, Inc., 2012 WL 79670, at *7 (W.D.N.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 am by Matthew Gilpin
Wyeth Inc. and In re Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust LitigationThe settlement agreements challenged in Professional Drug Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Wyeth would both forgo marketing its own authorized generic during that period and allow Wyeth’s generic Effexor to come to market early” (emphasis in original). [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:59 pm by FDABlog HPM
Supreme Court’s pro-preemption Mensing decision is inapplicable and a court should instead employ the preemption analysis utilized in the Court’s decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Bexis
Wyeth, Inc., 588 F.3d 603, 612-14 (8th Cir. 2009), reaffirmed after remand, 658 F.3d 867 (8th Cir. 2011).Also there’s Smith v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm by FDABlog HPM
  But it fits hand-in-glove with the Plaintiffs’ endgame: that “a court should apply the impossibility preemption analysis utilized in [Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm by Don Cruse
In view of the Supreme Court’s recent statements on the issue [in Wyeth v. [read post]