Search for: "HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 21 - 40
of 327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
California (1971) Snyder v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am
I don’t think that I began the Holmes-Laski Letters until my return to America in 1963. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:08 am
As a young government lawyer, he befriended Theodore Roosevelt, Louis Brandeis, and Holmes. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm
California Solicitor General Samuel Thomas Harbourt, and attorneys Bruce Andrew Wagman of Riley, Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP and Richard Mathew Wise with the California Department of Justice are on the other side. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
California (1884) that state power to pursue the common good is limited by the individual rights enumerated in the first eight amendments to the Constitution of the United States, similarly maintained in Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
California’s sterilization law was enacted in 1909. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Some of the most significant results came out of California, where voters chose to recall the progressive San Francisco District Attorney, Chesa Boudin. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
At the same time, though, it should be noted that Harlan sharply dissented when the Supreme Court refused to grant civil rights protections to Chinese victims of white vigilantes in California. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:52 am
It's now out in print, from the Cambridge University Press: Mark V. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm
Judge Closes Courtroom to Observers Midtrial—Murder Conviction Reversed In People of Michigan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Holm, 285 U.S. 355, 372 (1932).Justice Kagan’s remarks are the epitome of understatement. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Holm (1932) and Arizona Elected Legislature v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Holm (1932) and Arizona Elected Legislature v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Holm. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
