Search for: "HOME DEPOT USA V US" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2020, 5:17 pm by Peter Mahler
The Company The above-described scenario played out in a lawsuit captioned Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
City and County of San Francisco, a challenge to the city’s restrictions on the storage of handguns in the home. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Property, intangible) TTAB sustains 2(d) and 2(a) opposition, finding USPS Blue Mailbox famous (TTABlog) TTAB affirms FIRSTAIDE generic for bandages and kits(TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Home DepotHome Depot seeking to stop other ‘Depots’ (Vegas Trademark Attorney) [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:30 pm by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF WILL TORRES, AN EMPLOYEE OF HOME DEPOT USA: WILL TORRES, v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 5:52 am by Thomas J. Crane
Home Depot USA, Inc., No. 20-50736 (5th Cir. 8/9/2021) Judge Ho wrote that Allison knew the MSJ deadline was May 11. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Ronald Mann has this blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in Home Depot U.S.A. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Gray… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Home Depot USA, Inc., 741 F.3d 1061, 1071, n.4 (9th Cir. [read post]