Search for: "HOPE v. PECK" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 1:35 pm by Steven Hunter
This February in New York, Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck and counsel for the parties in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:35 pm by Steven Hunter
This February in New York, Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck and counsel for the parties in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Natalie Peck, also writing for Inforrm, posted a roundup of Module 2 (examining the relationship between the police and the press) of Leveson this weekend – recommended reading for anyone needing a quick catch-up on the major points. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
Many in IT Say No - bit.ly/wXQuhj (Roy Harris) Don’t Pin Your Legal Marketing Hopes on Pinterest Just Yet – bit.ly/zOlwgX (Gina Rubel) Federal CTO Park Brings Startup Mentality - bit.ly/wdFD57 (Evan Koblentz) Federal Summit Report: How Government Agencies Think about E-Discovery in the Cloud – bit.ly/ze3mmN (Russ Gould) Govt. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am by Rob Robinson
Peck – Part Two | eDiscovery Journal – bit.ly/yeUDvj (Mikki Tomlinson) Is Judge Peck the First to Require a Predictive Coding Protocol for Automated Doc Review? [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:46 pm by Christopher Danzig
In what appears to be the first federal case to adopt the use of automated coding, Peck, in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
The final week of module one brought the Leveson Inquiry to an explosive, if temporary, conclusion. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  It is highly unlikely that an unwitting fan hoping for a quick snap would resort to surveillance, persistent pursuit or door-stepping. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:18 am by Nathan Koppel
In light of the ruling in Wal-Mart v Dukes, Fisher writes, the tobacco industry likely hoped that the court would take a skeptical view of smoking class actions and agree to hear the case. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:31 am by Philip Thomas
One of the plaintiff's lawyers in the case was Robert Peck, who argued for the plaintiff last week in the Sears v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Gideon
Is that the level of discussion he hopes to foster when he writes? [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 5:57 am by David Cheifetz
  It might be bad for one's professional future, too, particularly if one is a trial judge hoping to move up the pecking order. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:05 am by SHG
  It's a problem if we have any hope that the disastrous development of 4th Amendment law over the past century, you know, where the courts have developed a half dozen exceptions to every platitude about our being secure in our persons and effects so that pretty much every warrantless search is okey-dokey, won't serve as our baseline for the future.Case in point, Orin writes about an 11th Circuit decision last week, Rehberg v. [read post]