Search for: "Ha v. Board of Parole"
Results 21 - 40
of 659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2015, 10:20 am
The board revoked his parole. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:20 am
The board revoked his parole. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:35 pm
LEXIS 75956; Nicholson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:50 am
The Court of Appeals does not think so.The case is Graziano v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:54 pm
On December 24, 2014, in Diatchenko v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:37 am
Violations and Revocation of Parole If an inmate who has been released on parole fails to comply with the conditions and restrictions imposed on him by the Prison Review Board, he risks the possibility of his parole being revoked and his being sent back to prison. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:24 pm
In Voss v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
The Parole Board did not take part in the proceedings. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 8:56 am
Jeffrey Cameron v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
(3) if the parole board grants parole to an inmate pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, the parole board shall require as a condition of parole that the parolee participate in substance abuse treatment consistent with the assessed treatment need of the parolee. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:06 am
In his second Petition, Hernandez challenged the Parole Board’s ex post facto use of Ind. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 359; [2008] WLR (D) 114 “S 35(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State power to override a Parole Board recommendation for the release on parole of a prisoner serving a sentence of more than 15 years, was not compatible with art 5(4) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
(3) if the parole board grants parole to an inmate pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, the parole board shall require as a condition of parole that the parolee participate in substance abuse treatment consistent with the assessed treatment need of the parolee. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:06 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 4:35 pm
Certainly, the Board has the right and obligation to consider the severity of the crime. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:58 am
An opportunity for parole for these minors would provide them with hope, while still allowing a board to determine whether they have actually been reformed or not. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:51 am
Before Norsworthy filed this suit, a panel of the parole board had on several prior occasions denied her parole. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
If the Michigan Parole Board wants to deny these individuals parole, it has the discretion to do so, but only “for substantial and compelling reasons stated in writing. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:38 pm
In Matter of Johnson v New York State Div. of Parole (2009 NY Slip Op 06359 [4th Dept 8/27/09]) an appeal from the dismissal of an Article 78 petition challenging the denial of parole, the Fourth Department reversed and ordered a new parole hearing upon a finding that the Parole Board failed to weigh all of the relevant statutory factors and that there is "a strong indication that the denial of petitioner's application was a foregone… [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
Finally, it appears that the review procedure does not apply to sentences to life with parole under North Carolina’s Miller v. [read post]
