Search for: "Hagans v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2018, 6:02 am
Despite their limitations, the Supreme Court cited both theories in one of its last major insider trading decisions, United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 5:31 pm
Crane, International humanitarian law in an age of extremes: unlawful uses of force by non-state actors Larissa van den Herik & Catherine Harwood, Commissions of inquiry and the Jus ad Bellum Douglas J. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of July, two thousand eighteen.PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,REENA RAGGI,PETER W. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Since the precipitous drop in United States law school enrolments began close to a decade ago, enrolments system wide have been cut in half. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
Such remedies should include judicial and non-judicial remedies compatible with the Third Pillar duties and responsibilities of States under the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
I set out very brief overview of a handful of the many interesting cases highlighted by the speaker.Phonographic Performance Ltd v Hagan [2016] EWHC 3076 (IPEC), HHJ Hacon (Procedure) This case arguably caused the most surprise in the room on the night, particularly for those who regularly litigate in the IPEC (where costs are king). [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Second, the adoption of the misappropriation theory of insider trading in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm by David Strifling
Briggs, 229 U.S. 82, 88 (1913)). [4] United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:13 pm by Mark Astarita
" Years later the Supreme Court adopted this misreading, in United States v. [read post]