Search for: "Hale v. Collins" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
Lord [Sky]Walker and Lord Collins wrote the judgment of the court, with Lady Hale and Lord Phillips agreeing in full. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
To follow is the appeal of The Belize Bank Limited v The Association of Concerned Belizeans and others on Wednesday 29 June 2011 to be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am by Laura Sandwell
The issue for the bench (L Hale, L Wilson, L Sumption, L Reed, and L Collins) is whether a purchaser may create an equitable interest capable of binding third parties at the point of the contract of sale; and whether the principles set out in Abbey National B.S. v Cann [1991] AC 56 are applicable. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
But what is remarkable is the assessment Lord Hope (and indeed Baroness Hale) make of the judgments in Thompson and Burrows. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
But what is remarkable is the assessment Lord Hope (and indeed Baroness Hale) make of the judgments in Thompson and Burrows. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:02 am by chief
The judgments of Baroness Hale of Richmond JSC and Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC are expressed in terms which appear sanguine about this - see for example Baroness Hale at paragraph 33 and Lord Hope at paragraph 54. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:02 am by chief
The judgments of Baroness Hale of Richmond JSC and Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC are expressed in terms which appear sanguine about this - see for example Baroness Hale at paragraph 33 and Lord Hope at paragraph 54. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
The second appeal in the Supreme Court this week is In the matter of Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Limited (in administration) and In the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986 which is to be heard on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:41 am by Dave
We have dealt with the basic facts in Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd [2014] UKSC 52 when considering its previous incarnations (Cooke v Mortgage Business [2012] EWCA Civ 17 and Re North East Property Buyers Ltd [2010] EWHC 2991 (Ch)). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 March, Bloomsbury International Limited and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will be heard by Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lords Mance and Collins. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
 Baroness Hale/Lord Walker are quite amusing about the foundational case, Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 noting that “their Lordships speeches were singularly unresponsive to each other” (at [28]), but then the hard work begins. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am by Vipul Kapoor, Olswang LLP
However, the justices did discuss it, with a notable point arising in that Lord Collins and Lord Sumption agreed that the contract, as well as the conveyance and the mortgage, were all part of the same transaction, whilst Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Reed disagreed that the contract was part of the indivisible transaction. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
The case of E (Children) will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Sir Nicholas Wilson. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am by ASAD KHAN
Moreover, Lord Carnwath advocated the rationale in the ILPA case where Collins J demonstrated “a clear understanding” of the practical consequences of invalidity. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]