Search for: "Hale v. Scott" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
Lord Neuberger deals with the first argument, on which Baroness Hale makes some comments as does Lord Scott (who seemed a bit more troubled than the others). [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:06 pm by Edward Hale
The agency, however, has reclassified FDA-Approved drugs that contain less than 0.1 percent CBD as Schedule V drugs—an apparent carve out for Epidolex. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Their Lordships don’t for example, deal with Hussain, Mowan, Smith v Scott etc in any detail. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
Lady Hale, who sat with Lord Scott in Savage, did so in forthright terms unlikely to warm judicial relations: “There is no warrant, in the jurisprudence or in humanity, for the distinction … drawn by Lord Scott” [92]. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 20 February, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Scott v AG & Anor (Bahamas). [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  In Steel v United Kingdom ((2005) 41 EHRR 22) the Court found violations of Article 6 and Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm by Giles Peaker
See generally the non-exhaustive list of factors set out in the judgment of Scott Baker J in R (Khan) v London Borough of Newham [2001] EWHC Admin 589 at paragraphs 8 to 14. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Scott Oswald assesses the argument, concluding that “the eight justices of the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
 The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Tuesday 13 November 2018 there was a hearing in the Privy Council (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lords Briggs and Kitchin) of an Isle of Man libel appeal, Nugent v Willers. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Stephen Griffin
Powell, Hale, Commons, Cohen, and Dewey.All very well, but what impact does this “historicist turn” have on conventional versions of the living Constitution as well as the standard debate between this point of view and originalism? [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Too Much Media v Hale the New Jersey ruled this week that blogger Shellee Hale was not a journalist entitled to protect confidential sources and newsgathering information under the State’s “shield law”. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]