Search for: "Hale v. Young"
Results 21 - 40
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
| Young ICCA – WIPO Seminar on IP Arbitration | Interested in fashion law? [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
| Young ICCA – WIPO Seminar on IP Arbitration | Interested in fashion law? [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:26 pm
| Young ICCA – WIPO Seminar on IP Arbitration | Interested in fashion law? [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
Peter Ling reports on the Young ICCA - WIPO Seminar on IP Arbitration.Interested in Fashion law? [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
The leading judgment for the majority was given by Lord Sumption, with a concurring judgment delivered by Lady Hale. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
This issue was considered earlier this year n the case of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Rather than adults’ rights, two very young British children’s rights hung in the balance. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:00 am
Here it is: “RECENT RESEARCH: SHARED PARENTING VERSUS SINGLE PARENTING Shared Parenting Data In December, 2016, The American Psychological Association published research by William V. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am
” Lady Hale agreed, adding that in her view it was “absolutely plain that Parliament did intend there to be such civil liability. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
Some days after arriving in the UK, in violation of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, s 1, she committed the offence of cruelty to her son. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
Although it is a rare judgment from Lady Hale that does not reference it, it is not directly applicable in UK law. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am
Lord Drummond Young considered that despite differences in the legislation involved, there were “underlying substantive similarities” with Monk v Warbey which supported the view he took of the Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
Additionally, the privacy rights of the Giggs’ young children were never placed in the balance in the various iterations of that case. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:32 am
See, Ari v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 4:36 pm
In the Court’s view this distinguished the case from Baroness Hale’s example of Naomi Campbell popping out to the shops to buy a carton of milk. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The decision will therefore benefit many other young people like the appellant who have been living in the UK since a young age. [read post]
