Search for: "Halford v. Halford" Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2017, 8:03 am by Emily Fedeles and Nichole Sterling
In its decision, the ECHR considered and distinguished – but did not overrule – Halford v UK and Copland v UK on various case-specific facts. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In order to be non-essential, it must be found not to be essential under both questions.[354] This interpretation is consistent with the approach taken by the Federal Court of Appeal in Halford v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
A recent case (Stephens v Halfords Retail plc, unreported) reminded employers that blind reliance on a social media policy to dismiss a member of staff will not be enough. [read post]