Search for: "Hall v. POWER" Results 21 - 40 of 1,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm by Richard M. Re
The result would be a popular repudiation of Hall somewhat like the 11th Amendment’s repudiation of the 1793 decision Chisholm v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:08 pm
The new controversy resulted from the Court’s Nov. 16 order adding three new legal issues for lawyers to address in post-hearing briefs in Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:46 am by Cornell Library
The Vermont Supreme Court visits VLS tomorrow, March 28, and will hear six oral arguments in Oakes Hall. 9:30 AM- 10:20 AM: In re Joint Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp. et al., 2011-277 & 2011-366/367; 10:30 AM – 11 AM: State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:42 am by Dan Harris
Just as is true of Russia, the overriding attitutude in the halls of power in China these days is “let them eat cake. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:27 am by Dan Ernst
Catherine Martin Christopher, Texas Tech University School of Law, has posted Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada The CourtValid and Operative Division of Powers: Murray‑Hall v Quebec (Attorney General) In Murray‑Hall v Quebec (Attorney General), 2023 SCC 10 [Murray-Hall], a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) held that Quebec legislation prohibiting possession of cannabis plants for personal cultivation or use can coexist with a federal law permitting possession up to four plants. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:00 am by Roger Alford
Topics will include: Do arbitrators have the power to give Chevron what it wants? [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm by Mary Whisner
Rumsfeld decision on the limits of presidential power. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
” Section 14(b) “was designed to prevent other sections of the Act from completely extinguishing state power over certain union-security arrangements. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:18 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Rev. 1-34 (2012) Introduction: The Jones Act seaman has de facto power over whether a jury will hear his claim through his ability, under Panama Railroad v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
The War Powers Resolution is outdated, plain and simple. [read post]