Search for: "Halliburton v. Doe 1 et al"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Disgorgement does not “simply return[] the defendant to the place he would have occupied had he not broken the law,” the Court held. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm
” Extradition to the US – the Abu Hamza judgment As set out in a post by Isabel McArdle, further to a decision by the Strasbourg Court (which is not final yet – Hamza et al have 3 months in which to seek an appeal in the Court’s Grand Chamber), Abu Hamza and Babar Ahmad may now be extradited to the US. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
American Airlines et al (CAFC 2009-1450, -1451, -1452, -1469, 2010-1017) precedential The district court, in summary judgment, "held all the claims selected against the appellees to be either invalid or not infringed by the appellees' accused devices. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
San Mateo Sept. 1, 2020), In re Uber Tech. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
I mean really, how often does prior art have sex appeal? [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
But that does not mean issuers can take the Sample Letter lightly. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
