Search for: "Hamilton v. Clarke"
Results 21 - 40
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2021, 4:31 am
Borelli had clearly assumed representation of plaintiff by April 7, 2016, because on March 29, 2016, it opposed defendants’ motion for a charging lien on plaintiff’s behalf, and on March 31, 2016, it received plaintiff’s file from defendants (see MacArthur v Hall, McNicol, Hamilton & Clark, 217 AD2d 429, 429-430 [1st Dept 1995]). [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:55 am
Clark and Aaron Clark d/b/a Clark Electric Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Free speech rights in the Irish Constitution 2.1 The freedom of political expression The right “to express freely … convictions and opinions” contained in Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution is now understood, broadly speaking, as a freedom of political expression, concerned with the public activities of citizens in a democratic society (see Murphy v Irish Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, 24, [1998] 2 ILRM 360, 372, (28 May 1998) [37]-[44]… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:51 am
Hamilton, 331 N.J. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
Nevertheless, the Irish courts have acknowledged that the law protects reasonable expectations of privacy CRH plc v Competition and Consumer Protection Commission [2017] IESC 34 (29 May 2017) [32] (Charleton J)), albeit that it does so by means of a (constitutional) tort of invasion of privacy (the leading case is Kennedy v Ireland [1987] IR 587 (doc | pdf) (Hamilton P); on the juridical nature of such a claim, see now McGee… [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In a case pending at the Supreme Court, Fulton v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
Commentary on the case comes from Marci Hamilton, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, “whatever the Court does, employers and employees have good reason to demand clearer guidance from Congress. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm
Clark, 2010 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Anne Traum weighs in on Ohio v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
It will be for the seven Justices (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown and Clarke, and Sir John Dyson SCJ) hearing the appeals in these two parallel cases finally to determine the relationship of the Upper Tribunal to the courts in England and in Scotland respectively and, thus, whether the English and Scottish stories shall share the same ending. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Fatima Marouf looks back at last week’s oral argument in the immigration case Kerry v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Hamilton. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
Keith Dunn Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0667n.06 Derek Hamilton v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
Clark and Curtis A. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
”Ananda V. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Meanwhile, in the Privy Council Lords Phillips, Mance, Clarke, and Hamilton (Scotland) and Sir Henry Brooke will hear the following cases: Rhett Allen Fuller v The Attorney General of Belize from Monday 11 to Tuesday 12 April 2011. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
Anthony Bellia and Bradford Clark argued that Justice Neil Gorsuch correctly interpreted the meaning of the Alien Tort Statute during arguments for Jesner v. [read post]
