Search for: "Hamilton v. Target Corporation" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm by Kara OBrien
  Their actions allegedly allowed senior management to file materially false and misleading filings with the Commission and use corporate funds to pay for personal expenses and allowed DHB’s then-CEO David Brooks to divert corporate funds to a personally-controlled entity. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:02 am
Riches' celebrity targets include actors Anne Heche, Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones; musicians Cyndi Lauper and Eddie Van Halen; and Braves pitcher Tom Glavine.Riches has alleged that Eliot Spitzer "used the fines [from corporate convictions] to pay for prostitutes," that the MacArthur Foundation froze Riches' inmate account and funneled the money to Spitzer; and that Pepper Hamilton took a $1 million retainer from him and other inmates, but… [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even in the follow-up order in Wheaton College v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Tiger, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Tuesday, February 5, 2019 Tags: Acquisitions, Boards of Directors, Change in control, Duty of care, Financial reporting, Firm performance, Forecasting, Long-Term value, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Target firms Executive Compensation, Corporate Governance, and Say on Pay Posted by Fabrizio Ferri (University of Miami) and Robert F. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Botony Dental Corporation, Silvera v Olympia Jewellery Corporation, Strudwick v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Instead, it may well be the bare minimum that is required for the retention of key employees that are needed to meet production targets. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
On 12 February 2020 Nicol J heard the trial in the case of Hathi v News Corporation. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]