Search for: "Hana Bank" Results 21 - 40 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2016, 11:36 pm by Sean Hayes
Yonhap notes, in part, that: “The [M]inistry [of Strategy & Finance] said South Korea’s Hana Bank and Woori Bank have been designated as the clearing banks to take charge of won-yuan settlements and payments. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:13 am
" They are different aurally and visually, and according to Dial-A-Mattress no other evidence need be considered.The Board observed that, according to the Supreme Court in Hana Bank, "the question of whether two marks give the same impression to consumers 'involves a factual judgment,'" but applicant did not provide any evidence "demonstrating that consumers would consider IMÁGENES ESCONDIDAS and HIDDEN PICTURES to be the same mark even if they… [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Likely success: First, the court agreed with Tech that its use of UBER related back to the registration of UBERCAB in 2010—though this is a question of fact under Hana Bank, “this Court is confident that Tech would be able to convince a jury that UBER and UBERCAB would be ‘considered the same mark’ by a reasonable consumer,” so UBER was effectively registered in 2010. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
Hana Bank et al, 135 S.Ct. 907 (2015))possibly preclusive effect of TTAB decisions in later court cases (B&B Hardware v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 12:24 am by Sean Hayes
Broadway National Bank The post Merger/Acquisition Opportunities in Korea: Lotte Korea Buys KT Car Rental from KT Corp. appeared first on The Korean Law Blog by IPG Legal. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 [Comment: It seems to me that this question implicates two issues before the Supreme Court this Term: from Hana Bank, if classifying a term/mark is a question of fact and not law (and if placing a term on one side of the generic/mark line is a question of fact, why wouldn’t the descriptive/suggestive line be the same?) [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:14 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Supreme Court recently unanimously affirmed a lower court’s decision that tacking applied between the marks Hana Bank, Hana World Center, and Hana Overseas Korean Club. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am by Ronald Mann
Hana Bank earlier this Term, the statement of facts in the Baker Botts brief was, for me at least, so telling that it strongly predisposed me in favor of Baker Botts. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
WIPIP Session 1: TMDeborah Gerhardt (& Jon McClanahan), Colors 20 years of Qualitex: who is registering color? [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:57 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Hana Bank, found that trademark tracking (determining whether a prior version of a trademark may be "tacked" on to a later version of the mark for purposes of deciding priority) is a question that should be decided by a jury not a judge. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm by 500law
Hana Bank is a trademark infringement action involving the “tacking” of trademarks. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm by 500law
Hana Bank is a trademark infringement action involving the “tacking” of trademarks. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:42 am by Robert J. Morgan and Melissa Barnett
Hana Bank’s advertisements incorporated Hana Bank in Korean as well as the bank’s logo. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:26 am by Tim Sitzmann
The jury concluded that Hana Bank could tack its use of HANA BANK, HANA WORLD CENTER, and HANA OVERSEAS KOREAN CLUB all back to 1994, establishing priority over Hana Financial Group. [read post]