Search for: "Hand Trading Company v. Daniels"
Results 21 - 40
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2012, 4:15 am
In Preston v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:00 am
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:40 am
It is a hands-off game where the emphasis is on trading, investing, and larger market research. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
If the companies quickly squelch such legislation with trade secrecy claims, they should respect individuals who conceive of themselves as businesses, and consider their medical data among the most important of their "trade secrets. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:13 am
Hayashi, JD Candidate, and Daniel Buchholz, JD Candidate This post is Part Three of a Three-Part Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”) feature. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
On 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down by Lewis J in the long-running litigation between the Dyson Group companies and the broadcasters Channel 4 and ITN, Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB). [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
" The companies then responded, "but that will break our trade secrets and must be illegal. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
GuestKat Thomas Key shared his analysis of the decision in Daniels v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
If the companies quickly squelch such legislation with trade secrecy claims, they should respect individuals who conceive of themselves as businesses, and consider their medical data among the most important of their “trade secrets. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
Sometimes this can be an extraordinarily difficult task in itself in having to pry it out of the hands of the other party or the company’s accountant who is on side with the other party. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
Complete the look: Ralph Lauren Polo sweaterKat friend Just Wang analyses another Singaporean opposition trade mark case, in which passing off was relied on as the single (and successful) ground of opposition: When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark.In the conclusion of another trade mark battle, Mr Justice Arnold has handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155: BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references… [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:19 pm
By Danielle Kays, Sarah Bauman, and James Nasiri The Illinois Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated decision in Tims v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectual property (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
On12 June 2024 the Supreme Court handed down the long-awaited judgement in the case of George v Cannell [2024] UKSC 19. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
On Friday 13 April 2018 Warby J handed down judgment in the cases of NT1 and NT2 v Google LLC. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
Citing two of the leading insider trading cases (U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
Particular care should be given to pending trade mark or design actions before the EUIPO. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
The court’s decision in the case of PHH Corporation v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
The “RR/BAYC” NFTs were also made available for trading on the OpenSea NFT marketplace. [read post]