Search for: "Hand Trading Company v. Daniels"
Results 21 - 40
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Protecting Privacy and Privilege Rights in Non-Party Requests for Documents
15 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
The typical non-party targets are medical providers and insurance companies. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
In Jack Daniels v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:18 pm
The CATribunal will hand down a judgment in the summer. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
To conceal the hush money payment, it was agreed that Cohen would make the payment to Daniels via a shell company (Essential Consultants), on the agreement that Trump would later reimburse Cohen. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 19 May 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment dismissing the appeal in Stoute v News Group Newspapers [2023] EWCA Civ 523. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Canada On 12 April 2023, judgement was handed down in the case of Alberta Health Services and Sarah Nunn v Johnston, 2023 ABKB 209. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
While legal scholars have long recognized that shadow trading can be profitable, SEC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:19 pm
By Danielle Kays, Sarah Bauman, and James Nasiri The Illinois Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated decision in Tims v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
To date, only a handful of books about Wilson have been published. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
This is because copyright infringement goes hand in hand with derivative works and fair use. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Piepenbrock v London School of Economics and Political Science & Ors [2023] EWHC 52 (KB) by Heather Williams J. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm
On 11 January 2023, judgment was handed down by Master Davison in FKJ v RVT & Ors [2023] EWHC 3 (KB). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
"[10] The Supreme Court has not been clear about how to apply this undue burden test.[11] But the economic efficiency criterion that animates Dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence suggests that the out-of-state costs of a state regulation are often justified, and that courts should balance the costs and benefits of a state regulation and strike down only those that impose costs on out-of-staters that clearly exceed the benefits they bring in-staters.[12] A handful of Supreme Court… [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
" The companies then responded, "but that will break our trade secrets and must be illegal. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
