Search for: "Hand v. Briggs"
Results 21 - 40
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2016, 1:54 am
On 6 July 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Cartier International AG and others v British Sky Broadcasting Limited and others, ([2016] EWCA Civ 658) dismissing an appeal against an order requiring internet service providers (“ISPs”) to block websites offering counterfeit goods. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
On 13 and 14 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in the most important defamation case if the year – Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:35 am
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
On appeal, the UK Supreme Court panel was composed of Lords Mance, Sumption, Hodge, Reed and Briggs. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
It is arguable that Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs’ “subjective intention” test is more in line with the approach taken by the German courts in Östrogenblocker (applied by Hacon HHJ in the case at hand), which introduced a mental element based on foreseeability. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:39 am
In Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited [2018] UKSC 24, the Supreme Court has handed down a decision which has provided further certainty in the area of no oral variation /modification clauses, albeit in doing so it has overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal referred to previously in our blog of 7 July 2016. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
Three days before the judgment was initially due to be handed down, Lord Kerr sadly died. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:20 am
The providers appealed the case, and the Court of Appeal handed down its decision only a couple of weeks ago.As a brief primer to those who are not familiar with the case, Cartier International AG & Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Others dealt with the sale of counterfeit Richemont goods, encompassing the Cartier and Montblanc brands specifically. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 2:54 am
In Vedanta, a case with large similarities to the present one, Lord Briggs, handing down the judgment for the Supreme Court, had unhesitatingly acknowledged the unlimited jurisdiction of the courts at the domicile of the defendant company under the Brussels Regulation. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Judgment was handed down on 13 August 2021. [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:47 am
Justice Briggs in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division considered this issue in Key & Anor v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Briggs. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:06 am
In this post, James Warshaw, an associate in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, comments upon the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Lehtimäki and Ors v Cooper [2020] UKSC 33. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
In this case, Madison Ingram, a Trainee Solicitor in the technology & media team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court decision in Potanina v Potanin [2024] UKSC 3, which was handed down on 31 January 2024. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am
In this post, Adam Ferris (Senior Associate) in the Finance Disputes Team at CMS and Henry Powell (Associate) in the Real Estate Disputes Team at CMS comment on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Byers and Ors v Saudi National Bank [2023] UKSC 51, which was handed down on 20 December 2023. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
On 11 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mastercard v Merricks, dismissing Mastercard’s appeal. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:12 am
Judgment is yet to be handed down. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
It is arguable that Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs’ “subjective intention” test is more in line with the approach taken by the German courts in Östrogenblocker (applied by Hacon HHJ in the case at hand), which introduced a mental element based on foreseeability. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:43 am
In [2017] EWCA Civ 2[4], Patten, Briggs and Sales LJJ dismissed the appeal, agreeing with Arnold J that the Hearing Officer had made no error of principle in considering the issue of outstanding benefit. [read post]
