Search for: "Hand v. Chrysler Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Id. at *3.However the docs got their hands on this unapproved stent, it was supposed to be used in accordance with procedures overseen by the defendant's hospital's institutional review board ("IRB"). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:25 pm by Myriam Gilles
”  Applying this precept, the Supreme Court in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 475 N.E.2d 65, 70-71 (1985); Odgers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Well, the plaintiffs are some otherwise satisfied users of the drug, together with some third-party payers with their hands (typically) out. [read post]